Table 6.
Visual analog scale of the EuroQol and Pemberton Happiness Index outcome analysis with imputed data (N=221): intervention comparisons along the follow-up.
| Secondary outcomes | Time 1 (pretreatment) | Time 3 (6 months) | Time 4 (12 months) | ||
| VAS EuroQola | |||||
|
|
iTAUb vs HLPc | ||||
|
|
|
gd | 0.02 | –0.20 | –0.33 |
|
|
|
P value | .91 | .31 | .08 |
|
|
|
βe (95% CI) | 0.47 (–7.93 to 8.87) | –3.82 (–11.17 to 3.53) | –6.56 (–13.86 to 0.75) |
|
|
iTAU vs MPf | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.16 |
|
|
|
P value | .33 | .33 | .39 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –4.16 (–12.56 to 4.24) | –3.63 (–10.98 to 3.72) | –3.17 (–10.47 to 4.14) |
|
|
iTAU vs PAPPg | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.09 |
|
|
|
P value | .36 | .60 | .63 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –3.9 (–12.22 to 4.43) | –1.95 (–9.23 to 5.33) | –1.76 (–9.00 to 5.48) |
|
|
HLP vs MP | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.19 | –0.01 | –0.17 |
|
|
|
P value | .29 | .96 | .58 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –4.63 (–13.14 to 3.88) | 0.19 (–7.26 to 7.63) | –2.04 (–9.21 to 5.2) |
|
|
HLP vs PAPP | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.21 | –0.10 | –0.24 |
|
|
|
P value | .31 | .62 | .20 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –4.37 (–12.8 to 4.07) | 1.86 (–5.52 to 9.24) | 4.79 (–2.55 to 12.13) |
|
|
MP vs PAPP | ||||
|
|
|
g | –0.01 | –0.08 | –0.07 |
|
|
|
P value | .95 | .65 | .71 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | 0.26 (–8.17 to 8.7) | 1.68 (–5.7 to 9.06) | 1.4 (–5.93 to 8.74) |
| PHIh | |||||
|
|
iTAU vs HLP | ||||
|
|
|
g | –0.05 | 0.19 | –0.18 |
|
|
|
P value | .81 | .30 | .33 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –0.09 (–0.79 to 0.61) | 0.40 (–0.35 to 1.16) | –0.32 (–0.98 to 0.33) |
|
|
iTAU vs MP | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.08 | –0.49 | –0.06 |
|
|
|
P value | .65 | .01i | .75 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –0.16 (–0.86 to 0.54) | 0.98 (0.22 to 1.73) | 0.11 (–0.55 to 0.77) |
|
|
iTAU vs PAPP | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.10 | –0.42 | 0.09 |
|
|
|
P value | .59 | .03 | .61 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –0.19 (–0.89 to 0.5) | 0.82 (0.07 to 1.57) | –0.17 (–0.82 to 0.48) |
|
|
HLP vs MP | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.04 | –0.27 | –0.25 |
|
|
|
P value | .84 | .14 | .20 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –0.07 (–0.78 to 0.64) | 0.57 (–0.19 to 1.34) | 0.43 (–0.23 to 1.1) |
|
|
HLP vs PAPP | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.06 | –0.2 | –0.08 |
|
|
|
P value | .77 | .28 | .65 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –0.11 (–0.81 to 0.6) | 0.42 (–0.34 to 1.17) | 0.15 (–0.51 to 0.81) |
|
|
MP vs PAPP | ||||
|
|
|
g | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.16 |
|
|
|
P value | .93 | .68 | .41 |
|
|
|
β (95% CI) | –0.03 (–0.74 to 0.67) | –0.16 (–0.92 to 0.6) | –0.28 (–0.94 to 0.38) |
aVAS EuroQol: visual analog scale of the EuroQol.
biTAU: improved treatment as usual.
cHLP: healthy lifestyle program.
dg: Hedge’s effect size measure.
eβ: regression coefficient.
fMP: mindfulness program.
gPAPP: positive affect promotion program.
hPHI: Pemberton Happiness Index.
iStatistically significant values (P<.05) are shown in italics.