Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 19;19:93. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01073-w

Table 3.

Change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose between treatment groups

Efficacy outcome Week Treatment n Mean ± SD LS mean difference of change from baseline
saroglitazar vs. pioglitazone
Estimate Standard error 95% confidence interval p-values
HbA1C (%) week 12 Saroglitazar 2 mg 192 8.77 ± 1.86 0.40 0.17 (0.08, 0.73) 0.0156
Saroglitazar 4 mg 206 8.51 ± 1.57 0.18 0.15 (− 0.12, 0.48) 0.2368
week 24 Saroglitazar 2 mg 192 8.38 ± 1.66 0.23 0.16 (− 0.08, 0.54) 0.1536
Saroglitazar 4 mg 206 8.25 ± 1.61 0.10 0.15 (− 0.19, 0.40) 0.4924
week 56 Saroglitazar 2 mg 192 8.42 ± 1.84 0.31 0.17 (− 0.03, 0.65) 0.0698
Saroglitazar 4 mg 206 8.23 ± 1.73 0.15 0.16 (− 0.18, 0.47) 0.3742
FPG (mg/dL) week 12 Saroglitazar 2 mg 192 163.15 ± 70.14 13.31 6.26 (1.00, 25.61) 0.0341
Saroglitazar 4 mg 206 156.18 ± 60.92 6.55 5.72 (− 4.69, 17.79) 0.2524
week 24 Saroglitazar 2 mg 192 165.98 ± 67.44 13.28 6.24 (1.01, 25.54) 0.0340
Saroglitazar 4 mg 206 157.32 ± 67.98 4.85 6.23 (− 7.39, 17.09) 0.4363
week 56 Saroglitazar 2 mg 192 148.95 ± 52.41 4.76 5.18 (− 5.42, 14.93) 0.3587
Saroglitazar 4 mg 206 148.22 ± 60.25 4.18 5.47 (− 6.57, 14.94) 0.4447

Estimate, standard error, p-values and 95% CI are calculated based on ANCOVA (Analysis of Covariance)

n number of subjects in the specified category, LS least square