Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;70(4):259–267. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa003

Table 4.

Logistic regression analyses exploring the risk of alcohol misuse (AUDIT-C; outcome variable) with motivations for drinking and context of drinking associations (explanatory variables)

Variable AUDIT-C case (n = 236)a
n % Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Drinking motivations
 Drinking to copeb 13.00 (median) IQR 11.00–18.00 1.26 (1.21–1.32)*** 1.26 (1.21–1.32)***
 Social pressure 9.00 (median) IQR 7.00–10.00 1.03 (1.00–1.07) 1.04 (1.00–1.09)*
Drinking location
 Home 117 32.41 1 1
 Mess 25 12.32 0.29 (0.17–0.49)*** 0.32 (0.19–0.54)***
 Pubs 68 17.04 0.43 (0.31–0.60)*** 0.38 (0.27–0.55)***
 Civilian friends’ homes 7 6.54 0.15 (0.06–0.36)*** 0.15 (0.06–0.35)***
 Military friends’ homes 9 14.52 0.35 (0.19–0.67)** 0.35 (0.17–0.70)**
 Other 10 18.18 0.46 (0.23–0.94)* 0.47 (0.21–1.01)
Drinking with
 Military friends 65 15.66 1 1
 Other 8 15.69 1.00 (0.41–2.45) 0.94 (0.34–2.58)
 Civilian friends 46 14.70 0.93 (0.63–1.37) 0.81 (0.50–1.31)
 Spouse/partner 57 23.55 1.66 (1.14–2.42)* 1.60 (0.99–2.59)
 Family 12 18.75 1.24 (0.56–2.78) 1.15 (0.46–2.84)
 Alone 48 47.52 4.88 (3.04–7.83)*** 4.64 (2.55–8.42)***

Row frequencies and percentages are shown. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented (n = 1188).c,d

aReference group = AUDIT-C non-case (

 = 951).

bMedians are weighted.

cAdjusted for age, sex, service, serving, GAD-7, PHQ-9 and PCL-5.

dReference categories are most common group.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.