Table 1.

Analysis of Utilization of Telehealth Based on Type of Setting (Academic vs Nonacademic) and Geographical Region of United States

Variable	Total, n (%)	Telehealth (via video), %, mean ± SD	Telemedicine (via phone), % mean ± SD	In-person visits, % mean ± SD	Dedicated clinic time, min, mean ± SD	P value
Type of setting						.012 (for % telemedicine via phone)a .008 (for % in person)a
Academic	156 (67.8)	56.7 ± 30.5	35.7 ± 29.3	8.73 ± 14	New patient: 34.47 ± 10 Follow-up: 23.7 ± 8.5
Nonacademic	74 (37.2)	58.1 ± 31.5	25.3 ± 26.1	15.75 ± 24.5	New patient: 29.9 ± 9 Follow-up: 20.8 ± 7.2
Regionb						.005 (NE vs SE for % telemedicine via phone)c .004 (NE vs West for % telemedicine via phone)c .001 (NE vs SE for % in-person visits)d .029 (West vs SE had higher dedicated time for new patient visit, West had highest % TeleHealth via video, although not statistically significant)d .012 (West vs NE for dedicated follow up time)c .024 (West vs SE, dedicated follow-up time)c
Northeast (NE)	28 (12.2) Academic: 19 (67.9) Nonacademic: 9 (32.1)	50.5 ± 36.3	50.1 ± 33.7	2.67 ± 4.8	New patient: 31.8 ± 9.8 Follow-up: 20.18 ± 7.13
Southeast (SE)	105 (45.7) Academic: 71 (67.6) Nonacademic: 34 (32.4)	57.3 ± 30.1	28.7 ± 26.2	13.73 ± 20.2	New patient: 31.6 ± 8.4 Follow-up: 22.09 ±7.92
Midwest (MW)	37 (16.1) Academic: 32 (86.5) Nonacademic: 5 (13.5)	55.9 ± 23	38.4 ± 22.5	9.1 ± 14.6	New patient: 32.35 ± 10.1 Follow-up: 22.57 ± 7.61
Southwest (SW)	20 (8.7) Academic 11 (55) Nonacademic: 9 (45)	51.9 ± 34.2	29.1 ± 31.5	15 ± 22.4	New patient: 33 ± 11.05 Follow-up: 23.25 ± 9.36
West	39 (17) Academic: 22 (56.4) Nonacademic: 17 (43.6)	65.5 ± 32.7	24.8 ± 30.3	9.6 ± 18.6	New patient: 38.1 ± 11.9 Follow-up: 26.76 ± 8.9

^aUsing independent sample t test.

^bOne respondent did not specify region.

^cUsing 1-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post-hoc.

^dUsing 1-way analysis of variance with Games Howell post-hoc.