Table 4.
Multilevel models examining associations between THC urine drug screen and IPV
| IRR | β | Std. Error | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological Victimization |
||||
| Gender | 6.11 | 3.29 | 0.063 | |
| Race | 16.02 | 11.00 | 0.145 | |
| Age | −0.13 | 0.54 | 0.808 | |
| Alcohol Use | −1.88 | 1.22 | 0.125 | |
| Stimulant Use | 0.02 | 0.43 | 0.967 | |
| THC UDS | 16.00 | 9.71 | 0.100 | |
| Psychological Perpetration |
||||
| Gender | 5.42 | 3.43 | 0.114 | |
| Race | 12.67 | 11.54 | 0.272 | |
| Age | −0.32 | 0.40 | 0.427 | |
| Alcohol Use | −2.27 | 1.00 | 0.023 | |
| Stimulant Use | 0.08 | 0.34 | 0.808 | |
| THC UDS | 13.56 | 10.05 | 0.177 | |
| Physical Victimization |
||||
| Gender | 1.19 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.559 |
| Race | 1.58 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.505 |
| Age | 0.95 | −0.05 | 0.02 | 0.022 |
| Alcohol Use | 1.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.255 |
| Stimulant Use | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.940 |
| THC UDS | 8.22 | 2.11 | 0.56 | >.001 |
| Physical Perpetration |
||||
| Gender | 1.20 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.622 |
| Race | 10.83 | 2.38 | 0.82 | 0.004 |
| Age | 0.99 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.608 |
| Alcohol Use | 1.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.479 |
| Stimulant Use | 0.98 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 0.319 |
| THC UDS | 2.54 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.213 |
Note: Psychological IPV was estimated using OLS regression, physical IPV was estimated using negative binomial regression. Significant effects are bolded. IRR = Incidence rate ratio. Gender (female =1, male =2). Racial identity (1=White, 2=Non-White).