Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 21;81(4):607–613. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051

Table 3.

Measures of diagnostic accuracy of FebriDx MxA for identification of any respiratory virus, compared to the reference standard of PCR positivity, n = 248.

n/n Value (95%CI)
Prevalence of any virus* 135/248 54 (48 to 61)
 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) 118/248 48 (41 to 54)
 Rhino/enterovirus 10/248 4 (2 to 7)
 Human Metapneumovirus 4/248 2 (1 to 4)
 Human Coronavirus OC43 2/248 2 (1 to 4)
 Human Coronavirus HKU1 1/248 1 (0 to 2)
 Human Coronavirus NL63 1/248 1 (0 to 2)
Sensitivity† 117/135 87 (80 to 92)
Specificity 102/113 90 (83 to 95)
Positive predictive value 117/128 91 (86 to 94)
Negative predictive value 112/120 85 (78 to 90)
Positive likelihood ratio 8.9 (5.1 to 15.7)
Negative likelihood ratio 0.15 (0.1 to 0.23)
Overall accuracy 219/248 88 (83 to 92)

CI=Confidence interval. *One patient had co-detection of SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV HKU1. † Viral detections associated with false negative MxA were: SARS-CoV-2 × 8, Rhino/enterovirus x 7 and Human Coronavirus x 3.