Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 16;9(5):198–205. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.107

Table 2. Hypothesis Description .

Set of Hypotheses Independent Variables (No. of Levels) Hypothesis Statements ANOVA Design
Set 1 Gender (2), age (3), mode of arrival (2) H11: gender has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 1. 2*3*2
H12: age has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 1.
H13: mode of arrival has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 1.
H14: gender and age have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 1.
H15: gender and mode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 1.
H16: age and mode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 1.
H17: gender, age and mode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 1.
Set 2 Gender (2), age (3), clinical acuity (2) H21: gender has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 2. 2*3*2
H22: age has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 2.
H23: clinical acuity has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 2.
H24: gender and age have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 2.
H25: gender and clinical acuity have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 2.
H26: age and clinical acuity have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 2.
H27: gender, age and clinical acuity have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 2.
Set 3 Gender (2), clinical acuity (2), mode of arrival (2) H31: gender has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 3. 2*2*2
H32: clinical acuity has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 3.
H33: mode of arrival has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 3.
H34: gender and clinical acuity have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 3.
H35: gender and mode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 3.
H36: clinical acuity andmode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 3.
H37: gender, clinical acuity andmode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 3.
Set 4 Age (3), clinical acuity (2), mode of arrival (2) H41: age has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 4. 3*2*2
H42: clinical acuity has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 4.
H43: mode of arrival has a non-significant main effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 4.
H44: age and clinical acuity have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 4.
H45: age and mode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 4.
H46: clinical acuity and mode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 4.
H47: age, clinical acuity and mode of arrival have a non-significant interaction effect on modelling ED-LOS with the independent variables of set 4.

Abbreviations: ED-LOS, length of stay in emergency department; ANOVA, analysis of variance.