Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Jun 21;81(3):e75–e78. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.042

Table 1a.

Assessment of sensitivity and specificity of the RST test (with 95% confidence interval) with respect to the nasopharyngeal swab, in the overall sample and stratified according to the setting of recruitment and presence of COVID-19 symptoms at the time of the swab test.

Sensitivity assessment Specificity assessment
n, N^ Sensitivity (95%CI) n, N* Specificity (95%CI)
All subjects 26, 28 0.93 (0.77; 0.99) 38, 91 0.42 (0.32; 0.53)
Setting of the nasopharyngeal swab procedure
COVID-19 hospitalized patients 23, 25 0.92 (0.74; 0.99) 4, 13 0.31 (0.09; 0.61)
ER patients 2, 2 1.0 (0.16; 1.0) 7, 18 0.39 (0.17; 0.64)
Healthcare workers 1, 1 1.0 (-) 27, 60 0.45 (0.32; 0.58)
COVID-19 symptoms
Any symptom 22, 24 0.92 (0.73; 0.99) 7, 17 0.41 (0.18; 0.67)
No symptoms 4, 4 1.0 (0.40; 1.0) 31, 74 0.42 (0.31; 0.54)

°: 3 subjects with a technically failed RST test (1 positive and 2 negative to the nasopharyngeal swab) were excluded.

^: n=number of subjects with positive RST, N=number of subjects with positive nasopharyngeal swab.

*: n=number of subjects with negative RST, N=number of subjects with negative nasopharyngeal swab

95%Confidence Interval (CI) from exact binomial distribution. (-): not reported.