Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 21;12(1):e12049. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12049

TABLE 2.

Log odds and standard errors of the effects of twin type and postnatal covariates on dementia risk in female twins

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Testing from age 60
Twin type −0.19 (0.13) −0.15 (0.13)
Education 0.04 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01)
Exercise −0.002 (0.08) 0.00 (0.08)
Vascular risk 0.03 (0.02) 0.03 (0.02)
Postnatal hormone exposure 0.01 (0.002) 0.01 (0.002)
Testing from age 70
Twin type 0.44 (0.15) 0.40 (0.15)
Education 0.04 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01)
Exercise 0.01 (0.08) 0.02 (0.08)
Vascular risk 0.04 (0.02) 0.04 (0.02)
Postnatal hormone exposure 0.01 (0.002) 0.01 (0.002)
Testing from age 80
Twin type 0.96 (0.29) 0.94 (0.30)
Education 0.06 (0.01) 0.06 (0.01)
Exercise 0.05 (0.12) 0.05 (0.12)
Vascular risk 0.02 (0.03) 0.02 (0.03)
Postnatal hormone exposure 0.002 (0.003) 0.002 (0.003)

Note. Bolded values indicate P < 0.05. Parameter estimates are pooled estimates across 25 imputed data sets. Birth year and the interaction between birth year and twin type were statistically adjusted for in all models.