Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;117(24):13480–13489. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921617117

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Probing the microviscosity of PEG solutions with FCS. (A) Diffusion of a particle through a solution of crowders with different sizes, with the respective thickness of the depletion layer, δ (red dashed circles). With increasing size of the depletion layer, the effect of the bulk viscosity of the solution on the local diffusion of the particle decreases. (B) Relation between relative bulk viscosity and microviscosity, quantified via the translational diffusion coefficient of NCBD according to ηmicro/ηs=D0/D1 for solutions containing different concentrations and sizes of PEG (color scale above), where ηmicro is the microscopic viscosity, ηs the neat solvent viscosity, and D0 the diffusion coefficient in the absence and D1 in the presence of crowder. The black dashed line shows the behavior expected from the Stokes–Einstein equation and the bulk viscosity. (C) Microviscosity analyzed with a model using solvent viscosity within the depletion layer and bulk viscosity outside (Eq. 5). A global fit of D0/D1=ηmicro/ηs across all PEG sizes and concentrations yields R = 1.8 ± 0.1 nm for NCBD.