Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;34(6):e23217. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23217

Table 2.

Frequency of aCL and aβ2GPI in patients with RA and in the control group

Autoantibodies RA patients (n = 90) Control group (n = 90) P
aPL (aCL or aβ2GPI)

35.5%

(32/90)

11.1%

(10/90)

.0001
aCL (IgG, IgA or IgM)

15.5%****

(14/90)

5.5%

(5/90)

.04
aCL‐IgG

8.9%

(8/90)

2.2%

(2/90)

NS
aCL‐IgA

4.4% *

(4/90)

2.2%

(2/90)

NS
aCL‐IgM

6.7%

(6/90)

4.4%

(4/90)

NS
aβ2GPI (IgG, IgA, or IgM)

32.2%****

(29/90)

11.1%

(10/90)

.0005
aβ2GPI‐IgG

6.7%**

(6/90)

3.3%

(3/90)

NS
aβ2GPI‐IgA

26.7%*, **, ***

(24/90)

7.8%

(7/90)

.0007
aβ2GPI‐IgM

5.6%***

(5/90)

4.4%

(4/90)

NS
*

Comparison between aCL‐IgA and aβ2GPI‐IgA (P = .00005).

**

Comparison between aβ2GPI‐IgG and aβ2GPI‐IgA (P = .0003).

***

Comparison between aβ2GPI‐IgM and aβ2GPI‐IgA (P = .0001).

****

Comparison between aCL and aβ2GPI (P = .008).