Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Jan 9;39(6):2121–2132. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2020.2965486

TABLE II.

Results table, performance of the different networks that have been tested for this study, divided into two main sections. The left-hand side, labeled “Regression Networks”, contains the results of the reference methods. The right-hand side, entitledRegression and Localization Networks”, displays the results of the proposed simultaneous biomarker regression and localization. Each row represents one of the proposed problems (PMA, SFA or CAC). Each column is the performance of the chosen network on the problems. ρ and ICC are reported for all networks. For PMA and SFA we also report the dice coefficient d and the average Hausdorff distance dH, since reference segmentation masks for the test set are available. For the problem of CAC, we also report the weighted kappa coefficient k and the accuracy for the different risk groups.

Encoder Regression Networks Regression and Localization Networks
Baseline Enc(U-Net) Enc(SE-Net) Enc(SD-Net) RL-U-Net RL-SE-Net RL-SD-Net
PMA ρ = 0.951
ICC = 0.950
ρ = 0.970
ICC = 0.969
ρ = 0.971
ICC = 0.967
ρ = 0.965
ICC = 0.963
ρ = 0.977
ICC = 0.976
d = 0.853
dH = 6.422
ρ = 0.978
ICC = 0.977
d = 0.875
dH = 7.049
ρ = 0.971
ICC = 0.970
d = 0.816
dH = 6.893
SFA ρ = 0.971
ICC = 0.970
ρ = 0.982
ICC = 0.981
ρ = 0.982
ICC = 0.982
ρ = 0.981
ICC = 0.980
ρ = 0.998
ICC = 0.998
d = 0.914
dH = 5.857
ρ = 0.997
ICC = 0.997
d = 0.908
dH = 6.016
ρ = 0.996
ICC = 0.996
d = 0.817
dH = 7.147
CAC ρ = 0.920
ICC = 0.919
κ = 0.761
acc = 0.780
ρ = 0.936
ICC = 0.926
κ = 0.727
acc = 0.726
ρ = 0.931
ICC = 0.931
κ = 0.753
acc = 0.750
ρ = 0.948
ICC = 0.946
κ = 0.853
acc = 0.885
ρ = 0.950
ICC = 0.950
κ = 0.852
acc = 0.842