Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 31;21(3):610–624. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy081

Table 3.

Simulation results for binomial settings. Results are generated based on 100 simulated datasets: mean(sd)

Binomial
Overlap Method CE CS SEN SPE MCC
0 Plaid 0.01(9eInline graphic04) 0.18(2eInline graphic02) 0.4(2eInline graphic02) 0.9(1eInline graphic01) 0.036(3eInline graphic03)
CC 0.0048(8eInline graphic04) 0.0022(4eInline graphic04) 0.015(2eInline graphic03) 0.99(2eInline graphic04) 0.003(2ev03)
FABIA 0.072(1eInline graphic02) 0.37(2eInline graphic02) 0.41(2eInline graphic02) 0.98(2eInline graphic03) 0.17(2eInline graphic02)
XMotifs 0.0013(9eInline graphic04) 0.0013(9eInline graphic04) 0.0014(1eInline graphic03) 1(4eInline graphic05) 0.003(3eInline graphic03)
ISA 0(0e+00) 0(0e+00) 0(0e+00) 0(0e+00) 0(0e+00)
GBC 0.57(1eInline graphic01) 0.6(1eInline graphic01) 0.99(1eInline graphic02) 0.98(9eInline graphic03) 0.77(7eInline graphic02)
sGBC 0.61(1eInline graphic01) 0.63(9eInline graphic02) 1(8eInline graphic04) 0.98(6eInline graphic03) 0.79(6eInline graphic02)
15 Plaid 0.012(1eInline graphic03) 0.17(2eInline graphic02) 0.4(2eInline graphic02) 0.82(5eInline graphic02) 0.039(4eInline graphic03)
CC 0.0064(1eInline graphic03) 0.0027(4eInline graphic04) 0.017(3eInline graphic03) 0.99(2eInline graphic04) 0.005(2eInline graphic03)
FABIA 0.1(3eInline graphic02) 0.34(4eInline graphic02) 0.39(3eInline graphic02) 0.98(4eInline graphic03) 0.21(4eInline graphic02)
XMotifs 0.0014(9eInline graphic04) 0.0014(9eInline graphic04) 0.0015(1eInline graphic03) 1(5eInline graphic05) 0.0036(3eInline graphic03)
ISA 0.012(4eInline graphic03) 0.0033(1eInline graphic03) 0.017(7eInline graphic03) 1(2eInline graphic04) 0.025(8eInline graphic03)
GBC 0.43(2eInline graphic01) 0.48(1eInline graphic01) 1(9eInline graphic03) 0.97(1eInline graphic02) 0.7(8eInline graphic02)
sGBC 0.6(1eInline graphic01) 0.61(9eInline graphic02) 1(3eInline graphic03) 0.98(6eInline graphic03) 0.79(5eInline graphic02)