(
A) Number of genes affected by
rsc deletions. For each mutation, the number of genes up or downregulated two fold or more compared to WT.
rsc1∆ (↑129↓45),
rsc2∆ (↑160↓129),
rsc30∆ (↑66↓168),
rsc1∆
rsc30∆ (↑162↓204),
rsc2∆
rsc30∆ (↑601↓589). (
B) Gene Expression changes. Violin plots showing log2 fold change of RNA in mutants at all pol II genes (6145 genes) and at ribosomal protein genes (132 genes) compared to WT expression. Change in expression reflects an average of three biological replicates,
Figure 5—source data 3. (
C) Rsc mutation redundancy relationship. (
D) Genome snapshots. Shown for select genes are low- (
GSM1891202) and high- (
GSM1891207) MNase-digested fragment coverage from
Kubik et al., 2015, Rsc1 and Rsc2 ChIP seq log2 fold enrichments, Hmo1 ChIP Seq log2 fold enrichments (
GSM1509041) from
Knight et al., 2014, and RNASeq coverage (unstranded) from an average of three replicates of RNAseq for WT (YBC604),
rsc1∆ (YBC774),
rsc2∆ (YBC82),
rsc30∆ (YBC695),
rsc1∆
rsc30∆ (YBC839), and
rsc2∆
rsc30∆ (YBC910).