Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism. 2019 Dec 23;24(5):1152–1163. doi: 10.1177/1362361319895923

Table 1.

Mean scale scores of Remaking Recess fidelity, individual attitudes toward evidence-based practices, and organizational readiness for change

Mean SD Minimum Maximum
Fidelity
 Observer-rated quality of fidelity 0.6 1.17 0.0 5.0
 Observer-rated completion of steps 1.1 1.80 0.0 7.0
 Self-rated frequency of use 0.8 1.32 0.0 4.0
 Self-rated completion of steps 0.1 0.18 0.0 0.6
Evidence-based Practices Attitudes Scale (EBPAS)
 EBPAS Requirements Subscalea 8.5 4.70 0.0 12.0
 EBPAS Appeal Subscale 13.3 2.85 7.0 16.0
 EBPAS Openness Subscale 14.4 1.71 10.0 16.0
 EBPAS Divergence Subscale 4.5 2.57 0.0 9.0
Staff-rated organizational readiness for change (TCU-ORC)
Motivation for Change
 Program needs 30.5 9.56 10.0 45.6
 Training needs 34.2 10.54 10.0 50.0
 Pressures for change 29.4 7.88 10.0 42.9
Institutional Resources of the Program
 Space 31.2 7.76 13.3 43.3
 Staffinga 31.0 7.21 15.0 43.3
 Training 34.3 5.81 20.0 42.5
 Resources 32.2 5.88 18.6 42.5
Personality Attributes of the Staff
 Individual professional growtha 35.4 5.04 26.0 46.0
 Efficacy 38.5 4.43 28.0 48.0
 Influence 32.6 6.11 20.0 43.3
 Adaptabilityb 38.2 4.85 30.0 50.0

Note. EBPAS scaling 0 = not at all, 1 = to a slight extent, 2 = to a moderate extent, 3 = to a great extent, 4 = to a very great extent. TCU-ORC scaling 1 = disagree strongly, 2 = disagree, 3 = uncertain, 4 = agree, and 5 = agree strongly.

a.

Negatively associated with self-reported fidelity at p < .05.

b.

Positively associated with staff’s perception of implementation intensity at p < .01 and completeness of Remaking Recess steps at p < .03.