Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;16:1305–1312. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.16.111

Table 1.

Reaction optimization under flow conditions.

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-16-1305-i001.jpg

Entry Equiv of substrate Solvent, conc. of 1 (M) Light source Cat. (%) Yield (%)a

1 25 CH3CN/CH2Cl, 0.04 465 nm, 18 W 1 40
2 25 CH3CN/CH2Cl, 0.04 400 nm, 10 W 1 52
3 25 CH3CN, 0.04 400 nm, 10 W 1 53
4 25 CH3CN, 0.04 400 nm, 10 W 2 68
5 25 CH3CN, 0.08 400 nm, 10 W 1 65
6 25 CH3CN, 0.08 400 nm, 10 W 2 64
7 10 CH3CN, 0.08 400 nm, 10 W 1 57
8 10 CH3CN, 0.08 400 nm, 10 W 1 63b
9 10 CH3CN, 0.2 400 nm, 10 W 1 61
10 10 CH3CN, 0.08 400 nm, 10 W 1 73c

control experiments

11 25 CH3CN, 0.04 465 nm, 18 W 1 10d
12 25 CH3CN, 0.04 400 nm, 10 W 0 17
13 25 CH3CN, 0.04 465 nm, 18 W 0 0

a 19F NMR yields are reported; b Degassed solvent; c Freshly prepared; d [Ir(dtbbpy)(ppy)2]PF6 as catalyst.

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-16-1305-i003.jpg