Table 6.
Performance summary of the proposed bidirectional LSTM in MITDB analysis 1 of Figure 9a.
| Type of Cell/Unit |
Input Sequence Length (in Number of Beats) |
Number of Hidden Layer |
Overall Accuracy |
Overall Precision |
Overall Recall |
F1 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSTM | 0–2 | 1 | 6.28% | 7.4% | 6.21% | 0.0676 |
| LSTM | 0–2 | 2 | 38.80% | 35.66% | 38.83% | 0.3717 |
| LSTM | 0–2 | 3 | 1.87% | 0.06% | 0.18% | 0.0013 |
| Proposed LSTM | 0–2 | 1 | 81.70% | 82.83% | 81.68% | 0.9780 |
| Proposed LSTM | 0–2 | 2 | 97.78% | 97.77% | 97.77% | 0.9780 |
| Proposed LSTM | 0–2 | 3 | 98.53% | 98.53% | 98.53% | 0.9855 |