Table 7.
Performance summary of the proposed bidirectional LSTM in MITDB analysis 2 of Figure 9b.
| Type of Cell/Unit |
Input Sequence Length (in Number of Beats) |
Number of Hidden Layer |
Overall Accuracy |
Overall Precision |
Overall Recall |
F1 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSTM | 0–2 | 1 | 99.70% | 97.92% | 97.90% | 0.9791 |
| LSTM | 0–2 | 2 | 99.00% | 99.01% | 99.00% | 0.9900 |
| LSTM | 0–2 | 3 | 2.21% | 0.04% | 2.13% | 0.0008 |
| Proposed LSTM | 0–2 | 1 | 98.04% | 98.07% | 98.04% | 0.9806 |
| Proposed LSTM | 0–2 | 2 | 99.26% | 99.28% | 99.26% | 0.9927 |
| Proposed LSTM | 0–2 | 3 | 99.73% | 99.73% | 99.73% | 0.9973 |