Table 8.
Performance summary of the proposed bidirectional LSTM in MITDB analysis 3 of Figure 10.
| Type of Cell/Unit |
Input Sequence Length (in Number of Beats) |
Number of Hidden Layer |
Overall Accuracy |
Overall Precision |
Overall Recall |
F1 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSTM | 3 | 1 | 98.65% | 98.76% | 98.85% | 0.9981 |
| LSTM | 3 | 2 | 98.17% | 98.42% | 98.56% | 0.9849 |
| LSTM | 3 | 3 | 98.55% | 98.66% | 98.86% | 0.9876 |
| LSTM | 6 | 1 | 97.00% | 97.37% | 97.49% | 0.9743 |
| LSTM | 6 | 2 | 96.85% | 97.21% | 97.61% | 0.9741 |
| LSTM | 6 | 3 | 97.92% | 98.16% | 98.44% | 0.9830 |
| LSTM | 9 | 1 | 97.50% | 97.70% | 98.07% | 0.9788 |
| LSTM | 9 | 2 | 96.50% | 96.69% | 97.11% | 0.9690 |
| LSTM | 9 | 3 | 96.49% | 96.80% | 97.22% | 0.9701 |
| Proposed LSTM | 3 | 1 | 97.79% | 98.10% | 98.22% | 0.9816 |
| Proposed LSTM | 3 | 2 | 99.37% | 99.47% | 99.52% | 0.9949 |
| Proposed LSTM | 3 | 3 | 99.20% | 99.30% | 99.42% | 0.9936 |
| Proposed LSTM | 6 | 1 | 98.71% | 98.95% | 99.06% | 0.9901 |
| Proposed LSTM | 6 | 2 | 99.57% | 99.68% | 99.59% | 0.9963 |
| Proposed LSTM | 6 | 3 | 99.71% | 99.78% | 99.72% | 0.9975 |
| Proposed LSTM | 9 | 1 | 63.80% | 67.31% | 63.49% | 0.6534 |
| Proposed LSTM | 9 | 2 | 99.10% | 99.12% | 99.31% | 0.9921 |
| Proposed LSTM | 9 | 3 | 99.80% | 99.82% | 99.83% | 0.9982 |