Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 6;20(11):3236. doi: 10.3390/s20113236

Table 2.

Healthy vs. impaired classification results of individual tasks.

Task: Features Attribute Selection Accuracy
(10-Fold Cross-Validation)
Speed (s)
T1: 9 PCA (VC = 0.85) J48:84.90%,
SVM (RBF): 84.90%
Instant
T2: 10 WSE (VC = 0.60) J48 (NBM): 81.13% 0.07
T3: 28 WSE RF (KNN): 77.35% 1.72
T4 (spiral following): 22 WSE LR (LDA): 84.90%, 1.49
ANN (RF): 82.07% 36.06
T4 (spiral drawing): 22 WSE ANN (KNN): 87.73% 2.16
RF (FLDA): 86.79% 1.24
T9: 30 PCA (VC = 0.75)
CAE
LMT: 91.50% 0.04,
ANN: 90.56% 0.07
RF: 90.56% 0.02
T10: 24 CAE
WSE
KNN: 90.56% Instant
ANN (KNN): 89.62% 2.36
T11: 2 CAE RF: 74.52% 0.02
T12: 33 CAE
WSE
RF: 83.09% 0.03
ANN (KNN): 82.07% 5.84
T13: 25 WSE J48 (FLDA): 83.96% 0.50
T15: 4 CAE SVM (RBF): 78.3% Instant
Spelling (T7, T8, T11): 3 WSE LMT (RF): 74.52% 2.76
SAGE (T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11, T12, T13, T0): 10 PCA (VC = 0.50)
CAE
LMT: 84.90% 0.01
SMO: 84.90% 0.03
Duration (all tests): 16 WSE FLDA (FLDA): 89.62% 0.66

PCA (VC)—Principal component analysis with variance covered (VC); WSE—Wrapper subset evaluation; CAE—Correlation attribute evaluation; RF—Random forest; KNN—K-nearest Neighbor; SVM—Support vector machine; RBF—Radial basis function; LR—Logistic regression; NBM—Naive Bayes multinomial; LMT—Logistic model trees.