Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;20(11):3207. doi: 10.3390/s20113207

Table 2.

Comparison between various indices of fallers and nonfallers at t1. Data are given under the form median [1st quartile–3rd quartile]. SD = standard deviation, D = fractal dimension. These indices are followed by a subscript labeling the time series from which it was obtained. Results of the TUG test are given in the last line. Significant differences are written in bold font.

Fallers Nonfallers p
SDav (m/s2) 0.0949 [0.0810–0.149] 0.101 [0.0868–0.130] 0.245
SDaml (m/s2) 0.0864 [0.0752–0.109] 0.0950 [0.0747–0.109] 0.891
SDaap (m/s2) 0.120 [0.0901–0.173] 0.0900 [0.0753–0.120] 0.010
SDωv (°/s) 17.4 [15.5–20.2] 18.4 [15.0–21.9] 0.957
SDωml (°/s) 15.8 [12.3–20.3] 13.7 [11.1–19.2] 0.480
SDωap (°/s) 8.29 [6.77–11.6] 8.79 [7.44–12.6] 0.487
Dav 1.78 [1.73–1.82] 1.81 [1.77–1.85] 0.044
Daml 1.78 [1.66–1.81] 1.81 [1.77–1.83] 0.088
Daap 1.73 [1.68–1.80] 1.79 [1.73–1.83] 0.072
v 1.71 [1.67–1.76] 1.74 [1.69–1.76] 0.376
ml 1.74 [1.71–1.78] 1.78 [1.72–1.82] 0.098
ap 1.81 [1.75–1.83] 1.82 [1.78–1.85] 0.149
TUG (s) 23 [19–31] 19 [16–25] 0.035