Table 2.
Proportion of mobile health intervention on DSMES reporting RE-AIM framework dimensions and components (n = 20)
| Dimension and componenta | Proportion (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Reach | ||
| Methods to identify target population | 100 | |
| Inclusion criteria | 100 | |
| Exclusion criteria | 94.4 | |
| Sample size | 100 | Median sample size = 140 (range, 32-427) |
| Participation rate | 70 | Median rate 83% (range, 5.7%-100%) |
| Representativeness | 0 | |
| Efficacy/effectiveness | ||
| Measures/results at least 1 follow-up | 100 | |
| Intention-to-treat analysis utilized | 45 | |
| Satisfactionb or potential negative outcomes | 25 | |
| Attrition | 14.8 | Median attrition rate 15% (range, 2%-35%) |
| Qualitive methods to measure efficacy/effectiveness | 50 | |
| Adoption | ||
| Description of intervention locationc | 90 | |
| Description of staff who delivered the programc | 0 | |
| Method to identify staff who delivered the intervention | 0 | |
| Level of expertise of delivery agent | 45 | |
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria of delivery agent or setting | 5.5 (setting); 0 (staff) | |
| Adoption rate of delivery agent or setting | 0 | |
| Implementation | ||
| Intervention duration and frequency | 100 | Median follow-up 4.5 months, (range, 3-22 months) |
| Extent protocol delivered as intended | 30 | |
| Measures of cost of implementation | 15 | 2 studies reported monetary cost, 1 study reported time cost |
| Maintenance | ||
| Assessed outcomes ≥6 mo postintervention | 5 | |
| Indicators of program level maintenance | 0 | |
| Measures of cost of maintenance | 0 | |
| Program adopted in other setting/populations | 20 | |
DSMES: diabetes self-management education and support; RE-AIM: Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance.
b
Components were included to ensure relevancy with the mobile health interventions.