Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 30;19(5):1604–1620. doi: 10.1177/1471301218803195

Table 3.

Case study homes (n = 4) and participating staff (n = 7).

Care home pseudonym No. of potential care staff participants (grade) Changes in personnel since intervention No. of interview participants, by grade
Happy Haven n = 3 (1 manager, 2 senior care assistants) No change n = 3 (1 manager, 2 senior care assistants)
Careful Place n = 3 (1 manager, 2 care assistants) One care assistant went on maternity leave n = 1 (manager)
Home Court n = 5 (1 manager, 2 senior care staff, 2 care assistants) Manager stepped down but in home once a week to train staff; one care worker employed as an acting manager, one care worker left, one unable to be released n = 1 (care assistant)
Lifelong Lodge n = 3 (1 manager, 2 care assistants) One care worker on long-term leave after training n = 2 (1 manager, 1 care assistant)

Source: adapted from Moniz-Cook et al. (2017).