Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Ergon. 2020 Feb 12;85:103059. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103059

Table 3.

Dimensions of barriers and facilitators in care transitions processes.

Dimension ED to OR (N=13) OR to PICU (N=12) ED to PICU (N=9*) Total (N=34)
Barriers Facilitators Barriers Facilitators Barriers Facilitators Barriers Facilitators
Anticipation 62% 54% 50% 75% 11% 44% 44% 59%
ED decision making 46% 23% 0% 0% 67% 78% 35% 29%
Interacting with family 46% 15% 17% 0% 22% 44% 29% 18%
Physical environment 54% 38% 25% 42% 0% 0% 29% 29%
Role ambiguity 46% 54% 25% 25% 11% 11% 29% 32%
Staffing/resources 46% 38% 42% 50% 56% 44% 47% 44%
Team cognition 92% 85% 42% 100% 89% 67% 74% 85%
Technology 46% 31% 33% 58% 22% 44% 35% 44%
Characteristic of trauma care 31% 31% 0% 0% 11% 11% 15% 15%

Notes:

The percentages shown are the percentage of cases (the number of interviewees asked about that care transition, N in column heading) describing each dimension as a barrier or a facilitator, respectively, by care transition and overall.

*

One interviewee was not asked about the ED to PICU care transition, but volunteered a barrier for it in her description of another transition based on her previous experience in a role that participated in the ED to PICU transition

Shading in the heat map was defined by increasing the saturation of the red or green shading by 10% for each 10% increase in percentage of cases (e.g., shading for 0% is 0% saturation, shading for greater than 0% and less than 10% is 10% saturation, shading for greater than 10% and less than 20% is 20% saturation, etc.)