Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2018 Dec 3;16(1):016007. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaeb0c

Table 2.

Nine estimates (i to ix) and four methods (A, B, C, D) for representing the perineurium. “Constant” refers to constancy from Weerasuriya’s frog sciatic nerve measurements to our model, as well as across fascicles diameters in our model. Small fascicle: r = 0.1 mm; large fascicle: r = 0.3 mm. Rs: sheet resistance; ρ: resistivity. When using Method B with the multifascicular model, we used the resistivity from Method D, and multiplied by the perineurium thickness estimated as 3% of each fascicle’s diameter.

Sheet resistance for perineurial thin film approximation (Ω-m2) Resistivity of finite (meshed) layer of perineurium (Ω-m)
Constant Rs Constant ρ Constant Rs Constant ρ
A B – Small fascicle B – Large fascicle C – Small fascicle C – Large fascicle D
i DC, 21°C 0.0478 0.0132 0.0396 7967 2656 2198
ii DC, 37°C 0.0250 0.0069 0.0207 4164 1388 1149
iii 10 kHz, 21°C 0.0168 0.0046 0.0139 2800 933 772
iv 10 kHz, 37°C 0.0088 0.0024 0.0073 1464 488 404
V Common value in lit 0.0149 0.0041 0.0123 2483 828 685
vi 5 kHz, 21°C 0.0251 0.0069 0.0208 -- -- 1154
vii 5 kHz, 37°C 0.0131 0.0036 0.0109 -- -- 603
viii 20 kHz, 21°C 0.0094 0.0026 0.0077 -- -- 430
ix 20 kHz, 37°C 0.0049 0.0013 0.0040 -- -- 225