Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;8:28. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-00304-5

Table 1.

Effects of eating disorder symptom group, self-focused attention, and their interaction on the e-LEAS and FERT while controlling for the DASS-21-D

Measure Eating Group SFA Group Interaction
F p F p F p
e-LEAS
 Total Emotional Awareness 4.59a .036 1.32 .255 0.43 .515
 Emotional Awareness Percentile 3.97a .050 0.95 .332 0.22 .643
 Emotional Range 3.49 .066 0.01 .943 0.12 .730
 Multi-Level Responses 6.41a .013 0.01 .911 0.26 .613
 Total Word Count 1.53 .219 0.01 .919 0.17 .685
 Self Emotional Awareness 5.17a .026 5.84b .019 0.53 .468
 Self Word Count 0.76 .387 0.14 .713 0.24 .626
 Other Emotional Awareness 2.49 .119 0.24 .624 0.26 .615
 Other Word Count 2.69 .105 0.46 .498 0.08 .773
FERT
 Total % Accurate 0.65 .422 2.08 .153 0.07 .790
 Total Response Time (ms) 0.05 .882 1.85 .178 1.23 .271
 Negative Emotions % Accurate 0.40 .531 2.17 .145 0.14 .706
 Negative Emotions Response Time (ms) 0.14 .706 4.01b .049 0.02 .904
 Positive Emotions % Accurate 0.38 .540 1.41 .239 1.20 .278
 Positive Emotions Response Time (ms) 0.61 .437 1.71 .196 0.02 .888

Note. Eating Group (High-EAT versus Low-EAT); SFA Group (SFA versus n-SFA); e-LEAS = The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale – Short Version (electronic scoring); FERT = Facial Expression Recognition Task; aHigh-EAT group scored lower; bSFA group scored lower