Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;21:560. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04508-7

Table 2.

Comparison of secondary endpoints for the two groups at three time points after treatment

CN (n = 149) AT (n = 152) P
WOMAC scorea, median (Q1,Q3)
 46th day 9 (5, 14) 10 (7, 17) 0.008
 62nd day 7 (4, 11) 8 (5, 14.5) 0.003
 77th day 6 (3, 11) 11 (5, 16) < 0.001
Lysholm knee scoreb, median (Q1,Q3)
 46th day 78 (69, 85) 76 (66, 85) 0.791
 62nd day 81 (75, 90) 80 (70, 87) 0.101
 77th day 81 (74, 93) 80 (70, 88) 0.030
JOA scoreb, median (Q1,Q3)
 46 days 90 (85, 95) 90 (80, 95) 0.648
 62 days 95 (85, 100) 90 (80, 95) 0.157
 77 days 95 (85, 100) 90 (80, 95) 0.013
VAS scorea, median (Q1,Q3)
 46 days 30 (17, 40) 30 (20, 43) 0.115
 62 days 21 (13, 35) 25 (16, 37) 0.162
 77 days 20 (8, 33) 28 (10, 40) 0.011
SF-36 scoreb, median (Q1,Q3)
 46 days 536.7 (454, 636) 562.9 (464.6, 636) 0.816
 62 days 599.3 (514.3, 664) 590 (482.9, 651.6) 0.294
 77 days 612.5 (518.2, 674) 585.9 (487.3, 662) 0.179

P represents the comparison between the two groups at the corresponding time points

WOMAC score Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index score, JOA score Japanese Orthopedic Association knee score, VAS visual analog scale, SF-36 the MOS 36-item short-form health survey

aDisease severity increases as scores rise

bDisease severity decreases as scores rise