Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;9:90. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00735-4

Table 3.

Key characteristics of the investigated dispensers and handrub volume-loss in 8 h, relative to the baseline volume (N = 22)

Code name Dosing Pumping mechanism Condition Volume loss in 8 h
Dispenser #A Manual Regular New 99%
Dispenser #B Manual Regular New 96%
Dispenser #C Manual Regular New 92%
Dispenser #D Manual Regular New 70%
Dispenser #E Manual Regular Used 52%
Dispenser #F Manual Regular Used 32%
Dispenser #G Manual Regular New 32%
Dispenser #H Manual Regular New 24%
Dispenser #I Manual Regular New 20%
Dispenser #J Manual Regular New 20%
Dispenser #K Manual Regular New 19%
Dispenser #L Manual Regular New 7%
Dispenser #M Automatic Gravitational New 5%
Dispenser #N Automatic Gravitational New 5%
Dispenser #O Manual Regular Used 3%
Dispenser #P Manual Regular New 1%
Dispenser #Q Manual Gravitational New 1%
Dispenser #R Manual Regular New 1%
Dispenser #S Automatic Gravitational Used 0%
Dispenser #T Automatic Gravitational New 0%
Dispenser #U Manual Regular New -1%
Dispenser #V Manual Regular Used -1%

Footnote to the Table: Volume loss (average of 5 measures) at 8 h are indicated as percentages. Negative percentages indicate that the dispenser actually distributed more handrub than measured at baseline; such 1% difference can be explained by the variability induced by the method