Table 5.
Method | References | Population | Classification use score | Estimation use score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aaslid formula (Eq. 7) [142] | Aaslid 1986 [142] | Hydrocephalus, 10 | 3 | 2 |
Czosnyka [143] | TBI, 96 | – | 2 | |
Czosnyka formula (Eq. 8) [143] | Czosnyka [143] | TBI, 96 | – | 2 |
Schmidt [146] | TBI, 25 | – | 2 | |
Brandi [135] | TBI, 45 | – | 2 | |
Cardim [147] | TBI, 40 | 2 | 2 | |
Cardim [148] | Hydrocephalus, 53 | – | 1 | |
Edouard formula (Eq. 9) [144] | Edouard [144] | TBI, 20 | – | 1 |
Brandi [135] | TBI, 45 | – | 1 | |
Varsos formula [145] (Eq. 10) [145] | Varsos [145] | TBI, 280 | 4 | 2 |
Cardim [147] | TBI, 40 | 3 | 2 | |
Cardim [148] | Hydrocephalus, 53 | – | 1 |
Refer to Table 3 for interpretation of scores. If a method was not evaluated in the context of either classification or evaluation, then no score is provided for that use case