Table 2:
Comparability of study arms and subsets
| Comparison | p-value |
|---|---|
| Arm (1) vs. all Procedure 1 | 0.11 |
| Arm (2) vs. all Procedure 1 | 0.85 |
| Arm (3) vs. all Procedure 1 | 0.62 |
| Arm (4) vs. all Procedure 2 | 0.78 |
| Arm (5) vs. all Procedure 2 | 0.30 |
| Arm (6) vs. all Procedure 2 | 0.53 |
| Arm (1) vs. total | 0.27 |
| Arm (2) vs. total | 0.82 |
| Arm (3) vs. total | 0.62 |
| Arm (4) vs. total | 0.71 |
| Arm (5) vs. total | 0.23 |
| Arm (6) vs. total | 0.44 |
| Procedure 1 vs. total | 0.66 |
| Procedure 2 vs. total | 0.29 |
Listed are p-value for bootstrap comparison of linear-regression fits of Ct values of nasal swab vs. NP swab for observed samples for arms 1-6 from Table 1 vs. 10,000 random samples of either Procedure 1 (top three rows), Procedure 2 (next three rows), total (next six rows). Bottom two rows are bootstrap comparisons of all Procedure 1 (i.e., arms 1-3) to total and Procedure 2 (arms 4-6) to total. All comparisons show p>0.05, interpreted as no significant differences among arms and procedures.