Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2020 Jun 14:2020.06.12.20128736. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2020.06.12.20128736

Table 2:

Comparability of study arms and subsets

Comparison p-value
Arm (1) vs. all Procedure 1 0.11
Arm (2) vs. all Procedure 1 0.85
Arm (3) vs. all Procedure 1 0.62
Arm (4) vs. all Procedure 2 0.78
Arm (5) vs. all Procedure 2 0.30
Arm (6) vs. all Procedure 2 0.53
Arm (1) vs. total 0.27
Arm (2) vs. total 0.82
Arm (3) vs. total 0.62
Arm (4) vs. total 0.71
Arm (5) vs. total 0.23
Arm (6) vs. total 0.44
Procedure 1 vs. total 0.66
Procedure 2 vs. total 0.29

Listed are p-value for bootstrap comparison of linear-regression fits of Ct values of nasal swab vs. NP swab for observed samples for arms 1-6 from Table 1 vs. 10,000 random samples of either Procedure 1 (top three rows), Procedure 2 (next three rows), total (next six rows). Bottom two rows are bootstrap comparisons of all Procedure 1 (i.e., arms 1-3) to total and Procedure 2 (arms 4-6) to total. All comparisons show p>0.05, interpreted as no significant differences among arms and procedures.