Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e034552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034552

Table 3.

Goodness of fit indices for factor structure of CRBS translations

Factor structure (translation) χ2/df RMSEA (90% CI) TLI CFI IFI AIC BIC
Four oblique factors* (our study) 3.206 0.061 (0.052 to 0.069) 0.946 0.959 0.959 337.648 509.128
Five oblique factors (Brazilian–Portuguese) 3.965 0.070 (.065 to 0.076) 0.875 0.894 0.895 809.738 1047.172
Six oblique factors (Korean) 5.593 0.094 (0.087 to 0.102) 0.874 0.9 0.9 613.302 787.472
Four oblique factors (Malay) 7.18 0.119 (0.113 to 0.125) 0.674 0.716 0.718 1410.706 1606.871
Four oblique factors (Spanish) 4.87 0.094 (0.88 to 0.99) 0.796 0.822 0.823 988.586 1184.751

*This model included specified covariance between error terms such as 4 and 5, 5 and 2 and 3. Item numbers 5, 6 and 8 were deleted.

AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; CFI, Comparative Fit Index; CRBS, Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale; df, degree of freedom; IFI, Incremental Fit Index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index.