Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Vet Res. 2019 Jul;80(7):670–679. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.80.7.670

Table 2—

Comparison of linear regression models to evaluate age and height as predictors of speed and stride length for the same 57 dogs as in Table 1.

Outcome Predictor Adjusted R2* AIC Akaike weight
Stride length Age (y) 0.035 33.828 < 0.001
Height (cm) 0.76 −45.87 0.198
Height + age 0.78 −48.67 0.802
Stair trial 1 Age (y) 0.23 −6.37 0.497
Height (cm) 0.031 5.95 0.001
Height + age 0.24 −6.39 0.502
Off-leash trial Age (y) 0.19 150.49 0.386
Height (cm) 0.04 159.92 0.003
Height + age 0.215 149.57 0.611
On-leash trial with investigator Age (y) 0.102 50.95 0.159
Height (cm) 0.080 52.37 0.078
Height + age 0.165 47.81 0.763
On-leash trial with owner Age (y) 0.127 56.19 < 0.001
Height (cm) 0.328 41.24 0.023
Height + age 0.421 33.74 0.977
*

Adjusted R2 values indicate the proportion of variance in the outcome variable that is explained by the model, corrected for the number of predictor variables in the model.

Akaike weights indicate the relative probability of a given model being the best fitting among all models considered for a given outcome (eg, an Akaike weight of 0.977 for a given model was interpreted as meaning that there was a 97.7% probability it was the best fitting model among the other candidate models for a given outcome).

AIC = Akaike information criterion (measure of the quality of fit of each model, weighted by the number of factors in the model; smaller AIC values indicate a better fit).