Table 2—
Outcome | Predictor | Adjusted R2* | AIC | Akaike weight† |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stride length | Age (y) | 0.035 | 33.828 | < 0.001 |
Height (cm) | 0.76 | −45.87 | 0.198 | |
Height + age | 0.78 | −48.67 | 0.802 | |
Stair trial 1 | Age (y) | 0.23 | −6.37 | 0.497 |
Height (cm) | 0.031 | 5.95 | 0.001 | |
Height + age | 0.24 | −6.39 | 0.502 | |
Off-leash trial | Age (y) | 0.19 | 150.49 | 0.386 |
Height (cm) | 0.04 | 159.92 | 0.003 | |
Height + age | 0.215 | 149.57 | 0.611 | |
On-leash trial with investigator | Age (y) | 0.102 | 50.95 | 0.159 |
Height (cm) | 0.080 | 52.37 | 0.078 | |
Height + age | 0.165 | 47.81 | 0.763 | |
On-leash trial with owner | Age (y) | 0.127 | 56.19 | < 0.001 |
Height (cm) | 0.328 | 41.24 | 0.023 | |
Height + age | 0.421 | 33.74 | 0.977 |
Adjusted R2 values indicate the proportion of variance in the outcome variable that is explained by the model, corrected for the number of predictor variables in the model.
Akaike weights indicate the relative probability of a given model being the best fitting among all models considered for a given outcome (eg, an Akaike weight of 0.977 for a given model was interpreted as meaning that there was a 97.7% probability it was the best fitting model among the other candidate models for a given outcome).
AIC = Akaike information criterion (measure of the quality of fit of each model, weighted by the number of factors in the model; smaller AIC values indicate a better fit).