Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 21;8(1):e000230. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000230

Table 2.

Characteristics of 107 patients in the I/O analysis

All (n=107) Deleterious DDR (n=19) Wild type/VUS DDR (n=88)
Age at start of treatment (years), median (range) 61 (40–81) 60 (40–74) 61 (44–81)
Gender (male) 78 (73%) 13 (68%) 65 (74%)
Nephrectomy 100 (93%) 18 (95%) 82 (93%)
IMDC risk score at starting I/O therapy
 Favorable 23 (21%) 2 (11%) 21 (24%)
 Intermediate 65 (61%) 15 (78%) 50 (57%)
 Poor 19 (18%) 2 (11%) 17 (19%)
I/O therapy type
 Anti-PD-1 monotherapy 61 (57%) 10 (53%) 51 (58%)
 Anti-PD-L1 monotherapy 12 (11%) 3 (16%) 9 (10%)
 Anti-PD-1+anti-CTLA-4 32 (30%) 5 (26%) 27 (31%)
 Anti-PD-1+anti-PD-L1 2 (2%) 1 (5%) 1 (1%)
I/O therapy category
 Monotherapy 73 (68%) 13 (68%) 60 (68%)
 Combination 34 (32%) 6 (32%) 28 (32%)
Line of I/O therapy
 First line 40 (37%) 8 (42%) 32 (36%)
 ≥Second line 67 (63%) 11 (58%) 56 (64%)

CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4; DDR, DNA damage repair; IMDC, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; I/O, immune-oncology; PD-1, programmed cell death-1; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; VUS, variants of unknown significance.