Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2020 Jul;41(6):817–827. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002632

Table 1.

Response Rates for Impulse Hammer and Air Conduction Stimuli.

Impulse Hammer Force Level Adults Adolescents Children ALL
cVEMP Hard 100% (42/42) Not performed 100% (42/42)
Mean Peak Force 46.61 N
Medium 100% (42/42) 100% (28/28) 100% (26/26) 100% (96/96)
Mean Peak Force 27.42 N 27.48 N 26.40 N
Soft 100% (42/42) 100% (28/28) 96% (25/26) 98% (95/96)
Mean Peak Force 12.32 N 12.91 N 11.50 N
oVEMP Hard 100% (42/42) Not performed 100% (42/42)
Mean Peak Force 46.15 N
Medium 100% (42/42) 100% (28/28) 92% (24/26) 98% (94/96)
Mean Peak Force 27.98 N 29.06 N 28.29 N
Soft 100% (42/42) 100% (28/28) 100% (26/26) 100% (96/96)
Mean Peak Force 13.17 N 12.52 N 12.87 N
Air Conduction Stimulus Adults Adolescents Children ALL
cVEMP 500 Hz TB 100% (42/42) 100% (28/28) 100% (26/26) 100% (96/96)
oVEMP 95% (40/42) 92% (26/28) 88% (22/26) 91% (88/96)

Abbreviations: cVEMP, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential; oVEMP, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential; N, Newtons; TB, tone burst.