TABLE 3.

Hierarchical multiple regression results predicting creative performance^a.

Variables	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4	Model 5	Model 6	Model 7
Control
Age (years)	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.02*	0.02*	0.02
Tenure (months)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Educationb	0.21*	0.22*	0.16	0.17	0.23*	0.24*	0.19*
Genderc	–0.26	–0.26	–0.22	–0.22	–0.20	–0.21	–0.15
Independent
Perceived workplace accommodation		–0.03		–0.05	–0.03	–0.04	–0.06
Moderator
Disability severity					0.16	0.14	0.16
Interaction
Perceived workplace accommodation × Disability severity						0.10	0.13
Mediator
Creative self-efficacy			0.14*	0.15*			0.17*
R2	0.06	0.06	0.07	0.08	0.06	0.07	0.09
ΔR2	0.06**	0.00	0.02*	0.02*	0.00	0.01	0.02*
F	4.69**	3.79**	4.73**	4.03**	3.28**	3.15**	3.60**
ΔF	4.69**	0.25	4.62*	4.94*	0.72	2.29	6.36*

^an = 300; unstandardized coefficients are reported. ^bEducation coded as 1 = Junior Middle School and Below, 2 = Senior Middle School, 3 = College, University, and Above. ^cGender coded as 0 = Male, 1 = Female. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, two-tailed tests.