Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 8;318(6):C1065–C1077. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00035.2020

Table 1.

Comparison of skin and gingiva wound healing

Cutaneous Wound Healing Gingival Wound Healing
Fibroblasts ↑Expression of ECM molecules
α-SMA-positive
Reduced migratory ability (103)
Fetal-like phenotype (108)
Higher remodeling capacity (108)
Increase migration ability (65)
Higher proliferation rates (71)
Inflammation Reduced inflammatory response (33)
ECM components (71) ↑Collagens, SLRPs, matricellular proteins
↑TGFβ1–3, Smad, α-SMA
↑Fibronectin ED-A
↓Elastin
↓Collagen I, III
Epithelial closure Faster re-epithelialization (99)
Periostin Expression Granulation tissue-proliferating phase (18, 21) Granulation tissue-proliferating phase (54)
Periostin-null phenotype Delayed wound closure Not tested directly
Role of periostin during healing Myofibroblast differentiation and contraction, via β1 integrin, Src and FAK (21) Fibronectin synthesis via FAK/JNK signaling (55)

α-SMA, smooth muscle actin; ED-A, extradomain A-containing fibronection; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; SLRPs, small leucine-rich proteoglycans. ↑Higher/more; ↓less/reduced when compared with the other.