Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;267(11):3329–3336. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10004-4

Table 4.

Associations between continuous and categorical UPSIT scores and imaging outcomes in 389 cognitively normal individuals at age 69–71

Continuous analyses Categorical analyses
UPSIT score Hyposmia Anosmia
β 95% CI p β 95% CI p β 95% CI p
Associations by linear regression (β coefficient)
Hippocampal volume (mL)b,c − 0.002 − 0.004, 0.011 0.805 − 0.075 − 0.200, 0.050 0.239 − 0.162 − 0.540, 0.217 0.401
Entorhinal cortex thickness (mm)a,c 0.001 − 0.004, 0.006 0.671 0.010 − 0.039, 0.059 0.693 − 0.041 − 0.191, 0.108 0.587
Cortical thickness (mm)a 0.001 − 0.001, 0.003 0.156 − 0.003 − 0.022, 0.017 0.771 0.001 − 0.058, 0.059 0.986
Global cognitive score (modified PACC)a − 0.003 − 0.017, 0.011 0.657 0.001 − 0.141, 0.140 0.992 0.252 − 0.172, 0.677 0.244
Associations by generalised linear model (exponentiated β coefficient)
White matter hyperintensity volume (mL)b,d 0.992e 0.967, 1.016 0.609 1.153e 0.906, 1.468 0.247 1.280e 0.624, 2.628 0.501

aAdjusted for age and sex

bAdjusted for age, sex and total intracranial volume

cExpressed as the mean of right and left

dn = 377 for this outcome

eExpressed as exponentiated β coefficient; value represents the ratio change in WMHV per 1 point increase in UPSIT score, or between groups