Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):4142. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114142

Table 1.

Characteristics and quality assessment of the included articles.

Study Reference (Author, Year) Country Type of Nature Based Study Economic Method Quality Assessment of Economic Evaluation Method
Clarke et al. (1999) [43] United States of America (USA) Environmental public goods Paired comparison techniques Moderate
Doctorman and Boman (2016) [44] Sweden Forest recreation Contingent Valuation Method Low
Jankovska and Straupe (2011) [45] Latvia Forest recreation Travel Cost Model and Contingent Valuation Method Low
Longo et al. (2015) [32] United Kingdom (UK) Improved walking infrastructure Discrete Choice Experiment Low
Papathanasopoulou et al. (2016) [46] United Kingdom (UK) Physical activity in marine environments Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) Low
Rabinovici et al. (2004) [47] United States of America (USA) Lake recreation A policy framework Moderate
Remoundou et al. (2014) [48] Greece Marine restoration and public funding Discrete Choice Experiment Low
Smith and Moore (2012) [49] United States of America (USA) River recreation Travel Cost Model Low
Wang et al. (2004) [50] United States of America (USA) Recreational trails Cost analysis Moderate
White et al. (2016) [51] United Kingdom (UK) Recreational activities in the environment Travel Cost Model with QALY ratios Low
Willis et al., 2016 [52] United Kingdom (UK) Forest recreation Cost-Effective Analysis (CEA) Low
Zapata-Diomedi et al. (2016) [53] Australia Physical activity in local environments Health Adjusted Life Years (HALYs) models Low