Table 5. The efficiency of the four indexing modes (Eff1 to Eff4) in order of decreasing complexity (Comp) of the data sets.
| Sample | Data set | Comp (×10−6) | Eff1, dsp-pm | Eff2, dsp-tm | Eff3, strf-pm | Eff4, strf-tm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZSM5 | Monochromatic | 0.50 | 0.758 | 0.166 | 0.692 | 0.243 |
| MgAc | DET-90 | 0.85 | 0 | 0.091 | 0.260 | 0.621 |
| ZSM5 | 4% | 1.11 | 0.946 | 0.546 | 0.765 | 0.469 |
| ZSM5 | DET-90 | 1.63 | 0 | 0.206 | 0.719 | 0.964 |
| ZSM5 | 50% | 2.16 | 0 | 0.143 | 0.983 | 0.996 |
| ZrPOF | Monochromatic | 2.25 | 0.566 | 0.115 | 0.869 | 0.141 |
| MgAc | 50% | 2.48 | 0 | 0.546 | 0.642 | 0.900 |
| ZrPOF | DET-50 | 2.53 | 0.194 | 0.266 | 0.416 | 0.457 |
| ZSM5 | DET-60 | 2.84 | 0.155 | 0.746 | 0.992 | 0.993 |
| Sanidine | 4% | 4.95 | 0.932 | 0.477 | 0.973 | 0.656 |
| Sanidine | DET-90 | 8.62 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.998 |
| Sanidine | DET-50 | 10.68 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
| CsPt | Monochromatic | 10.90 | 0.809 | 0.370 | 0.778 | 0.401 |
| Sanidine | 50% | 16.01 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.998 |
| CsPt | 4% | 18.00 | 0.997 | 0.865 | 0.959 | 0.833 |
| CsPt | DET-50 | 80.21 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 0.995 |