Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 8;21(11):4089. doi: 10.3390/ijms21114089

Table 2.

MicroRNAs showing a significant difference between groups in the test phase 1.

N vs. Low-C N vs. Low-M Low-C vs. Low-M K-W Average Cq
miR-23b-3p x x - x 28.6
miR-27b-3p x x - x 28.9
miR-99b-5p x x - x 29.8
miR-152 x x - x 30.8
SNORD38b 2 x x - x 33.7
miR-204-5p x - x x 31.7
miR-221-3p x - x x 32.1
miR-34b-5p 2 x - x x 32.3
miR-146b-5p x - x x 32.6
miR-510 x - x x 37.9
miR-100-5p - x x x 31.1
miR-509-3p - x x x 39.9
miR-891a x - - - 27.2
miR-888-5p x - - - 28.2
miR-25-3p x - - - 29.5
miR-574-3p x - - x 30.3
miR-374b-5p x - - - 30.3
miR-30d-5p x - - - 31.4
miR-598 x - - - 33.6
miR-32-5p x - - x 33.6
miR-16-1-3p x - - x 33.9
miR-501-5p x - - - 34.1
miR-590-3p x - - - 34.7
miR-339-3p x - - x 35.2
miR-34c-3p x - - - 36.7
miR-99a-5p - x - - 26.4
miR-106a-5p - x - - 27.8
miR-24-3p - x - - 28.4
let-7d-3p - x - - 31.6
miR-376c-3p - x - - 33.9
miR-328 - x - - 34.1
miR-665 - x - x 36.1
miR-142-3p - x - - 37.0
miR-455-5p - x - - 37.8
miR-26a-5p - - x - 27.1
miR-20a-5p - - x - 28.8
miR-205-5p - - x - 28.1
miR-222-3p - - x - 29.4
miR-196b-5p - - x x 30.5
miR-532-5p - - x - 32.1
miR-892a - - x - 32.1
miR-18b-5p - - x - 33.0
miR-202-5p - - x x 34.7
miR-455-3p - - x - 35.3
miR-500a-5p - - x x 35.3
miR-502-3p - - x - 35.8
miR-31-3p - - x - 35.9
miR-181b-5p - - x x 35.9
miR-34b-3p - - x x 36.2
miR-202-3p - - x x 36.8
miR-502-5p - - x - 37.4
miR-449a - - x - 37.9
miR-335-3p - - x x 38.9
miR-509-3-5p - - x x 39.2

1 MicroRNAs marked with x in the first three columns showed a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between two groups in a Mann–Whitney U test. MicroRNAs marked with x in the fourth column showed the most significant difference (p < 0.1) among all groups in a Kruskal–Wallis test. N, normozoospermia samples; OL, oligozoospermia samples; AS, asthenozoospermia samples. Average Cq values of the nine samples in the test set are shown. 2 For both SNORD38b and miR-34b-5p, all samples in the normozoospermia group of the test cohort were positive, whereas all samples in one or two of the other groups showed a signal below the threshold. For both, average Cq was calculated for only the samples showing a significant expression.