Table 5.
February | March | April | May | |
Decorations | ||||
Creative Names | ||||
Taste Test | ||||
Flavor Station | ||||
Selection | ||||
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Fruit | 8.6 (1.0–74.3) | 0.8 (0.3–2.4) | 2.5 (0.6–10.7) | 9.2 (1.1–79.2) * |
Vegetable | 0.9 (0.4–2.0) | 3.0 (1.3–6.5) ** | 2.6 (1.1–5.8) * | 1.3 (0.6–2.9) |
Consumption | ||||
β (SE) | β (SE) | β (SE) | β (SE) | |
Fruit | 1.0 (8.9) | −1.0 (8.5) | −2.9 (8.8) | −3.5 (8.5) |
Vegetable | −19.4 (15.1) | −5.84 (11.8) | −16.9 (12.4) | −7.80 (13.1) |
Note: Logistic regression analyses were used for selection outcomes, linear regression analyses were used for consumption and waste outcomes. Variables in the model include: gender, grade, and entrée consumption). Target vegetable at School 3 was broccoli. Blue, green, orange, and yellow lines correspond to cafeteria decorations, creative names, taste test, and flavor station, respectively. SE: standard error. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01