Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 3;17(11):3971. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113971

Table 5.

Intervention component timeline and corresponding regression analyses examining changes in fruit and vegetable selection and consumption over time at School 3.

February March April May
Decorations graphic file with name ijerph-17-03971-i007.jpg
Creative Names graphic file with name ijerph-17-03971-i008.jpg
Taste Test graphic file with name ijerph-17-03971-i009.jpg
Flavor Station graphic file with name ijerph-17-03971-i010.jpg
Selection
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Fruit 8.6 (1.0–74.3) 0.8 (0.3–2.4) 2.5 (0.6–10.7) 9.2 (1.1–79.2) *
Vegetable 0.9 (0.4–2.0) 3.0 (1.3–6.5) ** 2.6 (1.1–5.8) * 1.3 (0.6–2.9)
Consumption
β (SE) β (SE) β (SE) β (SE)
Fruit 1.0 (8.9) −1.0 (8.5) −2.9 (8.8) −3.5 (8.5)
Vegetable −19.4 (15.1) −5.84 (11.8) −16.9 (12.4) −7.80 (13.1)

Note: Logistic regression analyses were used for selection outcomes, linear regression analyses were used for consumption and waste outcomes. Variables in the model include: gender, grade, and entrée consumption). Target vegetable at School 3 was broccoli. Blue, green, orange, and yellow lines correspond to cafeteria decorations, creative names, taste test, and flavor station, respectively. SE: standard error. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01