Table 1.
Study | Team Sport | Gender | N and Characteristics of the Sample | QS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Raab et al. [36] | Handball | Female and male | 69 high-level players (M: n = 19; F: n = 10), medium-level (M: n = 13; F: n = 9), and low-level (M: n = 8; F: n = 10) | 0.77 |
Vaeyens et al. [37] | Football | Male | n = 87, 13.0–15.8 yo
|
0.86 |
Den Hartigh et al. [38] | Football | Male | N = 88; 49 of them invited to practice at one of the five regional football schools, age: 10.91 ± 0.3 yo; and 39 non-invited, age: 10.55 ± 0.4 yo | 0.73 |
Diaz del Campo et al. [39] | Football | Female and male | N = 129; from 7 to 14 yo; 55 high-level and 74 low-level players | 0.77 |
French et al. [40] | Baseball | Female and male | N = 159; 28 of 7 yo; 44 of 8 yo; 45 of 9 yo; and 42 of 10 yo | 0.68 |
Keller et al. [27] | Football | Male | N = 62; age: 17.0 ± 0.6 yo | 0.77 |
Woods et al. [41] | Australian football | ND | N = 50; 25 talent-identified with 17.8 ± 0.5 yo; 25 non-talent-identified with 17.3 ± 0.6 yo | 0.68 |
Bennett et al. [6] | Football | Male | N = 328 (n = 119, age = 12.1 ± 2.6 yo; n = 171, age = 13.2 ± 1.7 yo; n = 38, age = 14.2 ± 1.5 yo). | 0.82 |
Raab et al. [42] | Handball | Female and male | 54 (27 male and 27 female) handball players (age = 15.27 ± 1.65 yo) of different ability levels (high-level: n = 16; medium-level: n = 20; and low-level: n = 18). | 0.73 |
Schorer et al. [43] | Handball | Male |
|
0.68 |
Sevil Serrano et al. [25] | Football | Male | N = 186; ages: between 8 and 19 yo | 0.73 |
Gonçalves et al. [44] | Football | Male | N = 54; 18 players with 9.86 ± 0.2 yo; 18 players with 12.87 ± 0.2 yo; and 18 players with 14.89 ± 0.3 yo | 0.73 |
Machado et al. [45] | Football | Male | N = 48; 24 with a 13.06 ± 1.5 yo; 24 with a 16.89 ± 0.1 yo | 0.77 |
Musculus et al. [46] | Football | Male | N = 97; 48 younger, age: 8.76 ± 1.2 yo; 49 older, age: 12.18 ± 0.9 yo | 0.77 |
González-Víllora et al. [47] | Football | Male | N = 57; 14 players with less than 8 yo; 13 players with less than 10 yo; 14 players with less than 12 yo; and 16 players with less than 14 yo | 0.68 |
Gil-Arias et al. [48] | Volleyball | Female | N = 8; age: 14.75 ± 0.70 yo | 0.86 |
Gil-Arias et al. [49] | Basketball | Male | N = 11; age: 12.7 ± 50.65 yo | 0.86 |
Navarro et al. [50] | Football | Female | N = 20; age: 17.3 ± 2.8 y | 0.82 |
Panchuk et al. [22] | Basketball | Female and male | N = 20; age: 17.0 ± 0.6 yo | 0.82 |
Pizarro et al. [30] | Futsal | Male | N = 8; age: 15.38 ± 0.6 yo | 0.77 |
Praxedes et al. [51] | Football | ND | N = 19; from which 10 average skill-level–age: 10.55 ± 0.5 yo and 9 low skill-level–age: 10.66 ± 0.5 yo | 0.82 |
Praxedes et al. [52] | Football | Male | N = 19; experimental group had 10 players with 10.55 ± 0.5 yo and a control group with 9 players with 11.77 ± 0.7 yo | 0.73 |
Praxedes et al. [29] | Football | ND | N = 19; age: 10.63 ± 0.5 yo | 0.77 |
Romeas et al. [53] | Football | Male | N = 23; age: 21.67 ± 0.5 yo | 0.73 |
Hohmann et al. [54] | Handball | Female and male | N = 20; age: born in 1993 N = 30; age: 14.89 ± 0.8 yo |
0.77 |
Fortes et al. [55] | Volleyball | Male | N = 33; age: 16 ± 0.6 yo | 0.86 |
QS: quality score; ND: not defined; yo: years old.