Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;17(11):3819. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113819

Table 2.

Comparison of various medical robots and their specifications.

Title Application Weight
[kg]
Dimension [m3] Nominal Payload [kg] Operation duration [hr] Max Speed [m/s] Origin Ref
RELAY Service 40.8 0.021 4.5 4 0.7 Swisslog, Switzerland [51]
TUG
(T3 XL)
Service 635 1.034 - 10 0.76 Aethon, USA [50]
HOSPI Service 170 0.633 20 9 1.0 Panasonic, Singapore [49]
RP-VITA Telemedicine 79.37 0.565 - 4–5 Pan: 90 °/s
Tilt: 60 °/s
iRobot, USA [43]
Roomba i7 Cleaning 3.37 0.01 0.37 1.25 0.3 IRobot, USA [54]
LG HOM-BOT Cleaning 3.17 0.0086 0.5 1.75 0.35 LG, South Korea [75]
KINOVA GEN3 Assistive 7.2 902 mm
(max reach)
2.0 - 0.5 KINOVA, USA [69]
EksoNR Assistive 25 - 100 1 Variable Ekso Bionics, USA [70]
Mazor X Spine Surgery 6.9 0.012 - - - Medtronic, USA [76]
Swingobot 2000 Cleaning 252 1.56 90 4 0.62 Diversey Inc, USA [57]
Cyberknife Radiosurgery 1267 1.01 240 - - Accuracy, USA [66]
LoRobot L1 Service 200 0.84 100 8 1.2 Hills, South Korea [52]

- refers to information not available or not applicable.