Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 23;12:1758835920933034. doi: 10.1177/1758835920933034

Table 4.

Studies that reported on patients who underwent local treatment for PCLM.

Author Treatment Patient number Age Female/male Number of LM Size of LM Effectiveness PFS OS Positive prognostic factors
Park et al.29 RFA 34 58.5 (38–78) 15/19 1–4 0.8–3.2 Complete ablation (100%) NR 14 Single LM, LM < 2 cm, good or moderate differentiation pathological type
Hua et al.9 RFA 102 55.3 (38–78) 36/66 2.0 (1–3) 2.65 (0.8–5.0) Complete ablation (94.5%) 9 11.4 Primary tumor in body/tail, LM ⩽3 cm,
Azizi et al.30 TACE 32 60 (49.5–67.5) 16/16 <5 (40.6%)
⩾5 (59.4%)
NR SD (71.87%)
PR (9.37%)
NR 16 Male patients
Vogl et al.31 TACE 69 NR NR <5 (26.1%)
⩾5 (73.9%)
NR SD (78.26%)
PR (11.59%)
NR 19 NR
Kim et al.32 SIRT 33 64 (47–83) 8/25 NR NR SD (37%)
PR (42%)
NR 8.1 NR
Michl et al.8 SIRT 19 63 (43–77) 9/10 NR NR Objective response (47%) 3.4 9.0 NR
Gibbs et al.33 SIRT 14 62 (48–76) 8/6 NR NR SD (71%)
PR (21%)
5.2 5.5 Resected primary PDAC
Kim et al.34 SIRT 16 63 (50–73) 5/11 NR NR SD (38%)
PR (31%)
NR 12.5 NR

LM, liver metastases; NR, not reported; OS, overall survival; PCLM, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with liver metastases; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PFS, progression free survival; PR, partial response; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; SD, stable disease; SIRT, selective internal radiation therapy; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.