Fig. 2.

—PE and hobo copy number predictions from short-read data and Nanopore counts are correlated. We sequenced individuals from five isofemale lines using short-read sequencing and long-read sequencing and scored the PE and hobo copy number. (A) Correlation between PE copy number inferred with the two approaches. The correlation between the two approaches was highly significant (Pearson’s R² =0.82; P = 0.015). (B) Correlation between hobo copy number inferred with the two approaches. The correlation between the two approaches was not significant (Pearson’s R² = 0.59; P = 0.13), in part due to lower total variation in hobo count across lines (∼16–22) compared with PE (∼8–22).