Table 3.

The results of the error metrics of different compared methods for two Block and Trim-star objects varying the noise levels.

		Methods	EAR	APSS	RIMLS	GLR	Ours
$\sigma =0.1\mathrm{h}$	Block	MAD	3.8083	4.2386	3.1723	2.9909	2.9232
		MSE	0.0693	0.0641	0.0466	0.0469	0.0477
		SNR(dB)	34.518	34.842	36.238	36.199	36.124
	Trim-star	MAD	5.0802	4.7813	4.1111	7.0203	3.6042
		MSE	0.0634	0.0324	0.0408	0.1105	0.0370
		SNR(dB)	29.572	32.459	31.472	27.120	31.855
$\sigma =0.2\mathrm{h}$	Block	MAD	6.2682	8.2802	4.1979	4.9876	3.5737
		MSE	0.1339	0.1191	0.0688	0.0911	0.0551
		SNR(dB)	31.676	32.149	34.552	33.310	35.492
	Trim-star	MAD	6.9177	7.0610	5.3676	8.3487	4.8816
		MSE	0.1068	0.0525	0.0573	0.1456	0.0522
		SNR(dB)	27.341	30.353	30.011	25.914	30.363
$\sigma =0.3\mathrm{h}$	Block	MAD	7.6707	11.629	4.6145	9.2070	4.4352
		MSE	0.1573	0.1640	0.1029	0.2735	0.0784
		SNR(dB)	30.980	30.753	32.816	28.488	33.955
	Trim-star	MAD	8.1821	10.9294	6.7664	10.495	5.8392
		MSE	0.0695	0.0995	0.0822	0.1828	0.0632
		SNR(dB)	29.158	27.576	28.465	24.915	29.608

Noise levels and the comparison method are (a) Cube $\sigma =0.3\mathrm{h}$ method CVN, (b) Fandisk $\sigma =0.28\mathrm{h}$ method RN, (c) Rocker Arm $\sigma =0.3\mathrm{h}$, and (d) Octhaedron $\sigma =0.3\mathrm{h}$.