Table 3.
Mixed logit models predicting whether the target was drawn from the sexually transmitted infection disclosure website, according to attractiveness ratings, the actual website, and photograph ratings.
| Variable | Model 4 (1738 observations, 87 participants) | Model 5 (1738 observations, 87 participants) | Model 6 (1738 observations, 87 participants) | ||||||||
| Estimate | SE | SD | Estimate | SE | SD | Estimate | SE | SD | |||
| Intercept | −0.04 | 0.09 | 0.44 | −0.05 | 0.09 | 0.40 | −0.06 | 0.08 | 0.39 | ||
| Attractiveness difference score | 0.13a | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.15a | 0.05 | 0.21 | −0.03 | 0.06 | 0.28 | ||
| Self-disclosed STIb | −0.15 | 0.11 | 0.10 | −0.14 | 0.10 | 0.07 | −0.10 | 0.10 | 0.09 | ||
| Intelligence difference score | −0.11c | 0.05 | 0.12 | —d | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Condom use difference score | — | — | — | −0.35a | 0.07 | 0.21 | — | — | — | ||
| Multiple partners difference score | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.38a | 0.07 | 0.21 | ||
aP<.01.
bSTI: sexually transmitted infection.
cP<.05.
dNot entered into the regression.