Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 10;60(Suppl 1):S42–S51. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ141

Table 3.

Total Demand for N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators (Respirators) and Effect of Demand Reduction Strategies 1–3 on Total Demand for Respirators (in Millions)

Model Pandemic Scenario Lower Bound Upper Bound
Base case 20% AR, low severity 2302 3053
30% AR, low severity 1662 2194
20% AR, high severity 2476 3467
30% AR, high severity 1867 2703
Demand reduction strategy 1 20% AR, low severity 573 754
30% AR, low severity 412 536
20% AR, high severity 610 838
30% AR, high severity 454 638
Demand reduction strategy 2 20% AR, low severity 20 56
30% AR, low severity 25 66
20% AR, high severity 57 139
30% AR, high severity 67 169
Demand reduction strategy 3 20% AR, low severity 61 80
30% AR, low severity 48 74
20% AR, high severity 83 138
30% AR, high severity 78 154

Effect of demand reduction strategies was calculated assuming the base case distribution scenario. Description of demand reduction strategies: Demand reduction strategy 1: limited reuse of respirators across all settings; Demand reduction strategy 2: limited reuse of respirators in intensive care unit (ICU), general ward (GW), emergency department (ED), and nursing homes, and substitution of surgical masks for respirators in outpatient clinics, emergency medical service (EMS), and for fire and police responders, with removing and putting on the same surgical masks for different patients in these settings; Demand reduction strategy 3: partial substitution of respirators by elastomeric respirators in the ICU and ED settings; limited reuse of respirators in GWs, nursing homes, and EMS settings, with use of surgical masks in outpatient clinics and by fire and police responders (removing and putting on the same surgical masks for different patients).

Abbreviation: AR, attack rate.