Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;10:10238. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66652-z

Table 6.

Association between the adjuvant therapy and TM-LVI status was assessed in each clinical stage.

Location TNM stage TM-LVI P
A Number (%) B Number (%) C Number (%)
Colon I 35(2.1%) 5(2.0%) 4(8.5%) 0.013
IIa 148(11.3%) 85(14.1%) 44(18.5%) 0.0054
IIb 44(23.4%) 33(21.3%) 17(19.8%) 0.77
IIc 15(19.5%) 14(21.2%) 11(22.9%) 0.90
IIIa 145(67.1%) 46(62.2%) 5(31.3%) 0.014
IIIb 398(61.1%) 401(66.7%) 261(62.3%) 0.10
IIIc 58(80.6%) 112(70.9%) 130(63.4%) 0.0003
Rectum I 45(3.9%) 14(6.3%) 2(4.0%) 0.25
IIa 86(14.8%) 85(19.4%) 37(21.1%) 0.059
IIb 12(20.7%) 26(34.2%) 11(22.5%) 0.16
IIc 9(26.5%) 8(26.7%) 13(44.8%) 0.22
IIIa 151(77.8%) 72(73.5%) 11(52.4%) 0.036
IIIb 272(73.5%) 293(72.7%) 225(68.8%) 0.34
IIIc 34(66.7%) 68(75.6%) 117(75.0%) 0.45

The application of adjuvant therapy was not related to the risk of recurrence as estimated by TM-LVI status except for stage IIa CC. Red circles indicated that TM-LVI was an independent prognostic factor for both relapse-free survival and disease specific survival. Adjuvant therapy may be recommended according to TM-LVI status in these stages.

Bold type, P < 0.05.